Murphy v. Bland
This text of 254 A.D. 905 (Murphy v. Bland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to compel the determination of a claim to real property by limiting an easement for a driveway, or, in the alternative, for damages for breach of covenant against incumbrances, the complaint was dismissed on the merits. Plaintiff appeals. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. It is not necessary to pass upon, and we do not pass upon, the rights of the mortgagee under its mortgage in the premises. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D. 905, 6 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-bland-nyappdiv-1938.