Murphy v. Bird

275 U.S. 487
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 24, 1927·No. No. 586·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied' for the reason that the Court, upon examination of .the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no substantial [488]*488Federal question presented upon which jurisdiction for certiorari could be based, application for which is therefore also denied on the authority of Tracy v. Ginzberg, 205 U. S. 170, 178; Bonner v. Gorman, 213 U. S. 86, 91; Central Land Co. v. Laidley, 159 U. S. 103, 112. The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the clerk from the special fund in his custody as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Lulu Mignon Murphy, pro se. No appearance for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Bird, 275 U.S. 487 (1927).

275 U.S. 487 (Murphy v. Bird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tracy v. Ginzberg
205 U.S. 170 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Bonner v. Gorman
213 U.S. 86 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Central Land Co. v. Laidley
159 U.S. 103 (Supreme Court, 1895)