Murphy v. B. Gertz, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murphy v. B. Gertz, Inc.

29 A.D.2d 666, 287 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4858

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 666 (Murphy v. B. Gertz, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. B. Gertz, Inc., 29 A.D.2d 666, 287 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Appellate Term, Second Judicial Department, dated April 21, 1967, which affirmed a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, in favor of [667]*667plaintiffs, upon jury verdicts in separate trials as to liability and damages, reversed, and said judgment reversed, on the law and facts, and complaint dismissed, with costs in this court and with $30 costs and disbursements on the appeal to the Appellate Term. Plaintiffs presented no proof of negligence; nor was there any proof of facts from which it could be reasonably inferred that the accident could not have happened except for negligence (Kulovany V. Orbach’s, 2 A D 2d 997; Aquilino v. Macy & Go., 12 A D 2d 765). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Babin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Appellate Term, Second Judicial Department, dated April 21, 1967, which affirmed a judgment of the District Court of Nassau County, in favor of [667]*667plaintiffs, upon jury verdicts in separate trials as to liability and damages, reversed, and said judgment reversed, on the law and facts, and complaint dismissed, with costs in this court and with $30 costs and disbursements on the appeal to the Appellate Term. Plaintiffs presented no proof of negligence; nor was there any proof of facts from which it could be reasonably inferred that the accident could not have happened except for negligence (Kulovany V. Orbach’s, 2 A D 2d 997; Aquilino v. Macy & Go., 12 A D 2d 765). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Babin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 666, 287 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-b-gertz-inc-nyappdiv-1968.