Murphy v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

191 S.E. 329, 211 N.C. 741, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 207
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 19, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 191 S.E. 329 (Murphy v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 191 S.E. 329, 211 N.C. 741, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 207 (N.C. 1937).

Opinion

PeR Curiam.

In tbe absence of any evidence at tbe trial of this action tending to show that plaintiff’s injuries were caused by tbe negligence of tbe defendant, as alleged in bis complaint, there is no error in tbe judgment dismissing this action.

All tbe evidence showed that plaintiff’s own negligence was tbe sole, proximate cause of bis injuries. In no aspect of tbe case is tbe doctrine of “tbe last clear chance” applicable to tbe facts shown by all tbe evidence. See Redmon v. R. R., 195 N. C., 764, 143 S. E., 829.

Tbe judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benton v. . Johnson
46 S.E.2d 645 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 S.E. 329, 211 N.C. 741, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-nc-1937.