Murphy v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

191 S.E. 329, 211 N.C. 741, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 207
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 19, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PeR Curiam.

In tbe absence of any evidence at tbe trial of this action tending to show that plaintiff’s injuries were caused by tbe negligence of tbe defendant, as alleged in bis complaint, there is no error in tbe judgment dismissing this action.

All tbe evidence showed that plaintiff’s own negligence was tbe sole, proximate cause of bis injuries. In no aspect of tbe case is tbe doctrine of “tbe last clear chance” applicable to tbe facts shown by all tbe evidence. See Redmon v. R. R., 195 N. C., 764, 143 S. E., 829.

Tbe judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 191 S.E. 329, 211 N.C. 741, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 207 (N.C. 1937).

191 S.E. 329 (Murphy v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Benton v. . Johnson
46 S.E.2d 645 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)