Murphy v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.

S.D. New York

Murphy v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 28, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-09919·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAMES MURPHY, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF DOC # AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY DATE FILED: 2/28/2020 □ SITUATED, Plaintiff, -against- 19 Civ. 9919 (AT) AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC., ORDER Defendant. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiff having filed an amended complaint on February 28, 2020, ECF No. 25, and the parties having requested a new briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss, which the Court granted, see ECF No. 24, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss filed on February 10, 2020 is DENIED as moot. See also Praileau v. Fischer, 930 F. Supp. 2d 383, 388 (N.D.N_Y. 2013) (“Typically, the filing of an amended complaint following the filing of a motion to dismiss the initial complaint moots the motion to dismiss.” (internal quotation marks, citation, and alterations omitted)). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 20. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 28, 2020 New York, New York

ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED JAMES MURPHY, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF DOC # AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY DATE FILED: 2/28/2020 □ SITUATED, Plaintiff, -against- 19 Civ. 9919 (AT) AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC., ORDER Defendant. ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiff having filed an amended complaint on February 28, 2020, ECF No. 25, and the parties having requested a new briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss, which the Court granted, see ECF No. 24, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss filed on February 10, 2020 is DENIED as moot. See also Praileau v. Fischer, 930 F. Supp. 2d 383, 388 (N.D.N_Y. 2013) (“Typically, the filing of an amended complaint following the filing of a motion to dismiss the initial complaint moots the motion to dismiss.” (internal quotation marks, citation, and alterations omitted)). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 20. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 28, 2020 New York, New York

ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge

Murphy v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Murphy v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (Murphy v. AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related