Murphy v. A. S. Kirkeby, Inc.
9 F.R.D. 725, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3319
Opinion
Assuming that evidence of prior similar losses may become admissible upon the trial —a matter for the trial judge to determine — the allegation of such losses is irrelevant and unnecessary to the cause of action pleaded. Retention of the allegation will prejudice the defendant, and it should be stricken. Best Foods v. General Mills, D.C.Del., 3 F.R.D. 459, 460-462; Contogeorge v. Spyrou, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 7 F.R.D. 223. Defendant’s motion to strike is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murphy v. A. S. Kirkeby, Inc., 9 F.R.D. 725, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3319 (S.D.N.Y. 1949).
9 F.R.D. 725 (Murphy v. A. S. Kirkeby, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Best Foods, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.
3 F.R.D. 459 (D. Delaware, 1944)
Contogeorge v. Spyrou
7 F.R.D. 223 (S.D. New York, 1946)