Murphy v. A. S. Kirkeby, Inc.

9 F.R.D. 725, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3319
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedDecember 21, 1949
StatusPublished

This text of 9 F.R.D. 725 (Murphy v. A. S. Kirkeby, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. A. S. Kirkeby, Inc., 9 F.R.D. 725, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3319 (S.D.N.Y. 1949).

Opinion

COXE, District Judge.

Assuming that evidence of prior similar losses may become admissible upon the trial —a matter for the trial judge to determine — the allegation of such losses is irrelevant and unnecessary to the cause of action pleaded. Retention of the allegation will prejudice the defendant, and it should be stricken. Best Foods v. General Mills, D.C.Del., 3 F.R.D. 459, 460-462; Contogeorge v. Spyrou, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 7 F.R.D. 223. Defendant’s motion to strike is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Best Foods, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.
3 F.R.D. 459 (D. Delaware, 1944)
Contogeorge v. Spyrou
7 F.R.D. 223 (S.D. New York, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F.R.D. 725, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-a-s-kirkeby-inc-nysd-1949.