Murphy Family Farms v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources

605 S.E.2d 636, 359 N.C. 180, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 1344
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 17, 2004·No. No. 558A03·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the issue in petitioners’ appeal relating to whether the breach and discharge constituted one separate violation, eight separate violations, or one eight-day continuous violation. Further, we hold respondent’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed. This case is remanded to the [181] Court of Appeals for further remand to Superior Court, Duplin County for reinstatement of the trial court’s judgment.

REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice NEWBY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy Family Farms v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources, 605 S.E.2d 636, 359 N.C. 180, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 1344 (N.C. 2004).

605 S.E.2d 636 (Murphy Family Farms v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Luca v. Stein
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2020