Murphy Family Farms v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Murphy Family Farms v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources

605 S.E.2d 636, 359 N.C. 180, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 1344

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 17, 2004

DocketNo. 558A03

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 605 S.E.2d 636 (Murphy Family Farms v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy Family Farms v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources, 605 S.E.2d 636, 359 N.C. 180, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 1344 (N.C. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the issue in petitioners’ appeal relating to whether the breach and discharge constituted one separate violation, eight separate violations, or one eight-day continuous violation. Further, we hold respondent’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed. This case is remanded to the [181]*181Court of Appeals for further remand to Superior Court, Duplin County for reinstatement of the trial court’s judgment.

REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice NEWBY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the issue in petitioners’ appeal relating to whether the breach and discharge constituted one separate violation, eight separate violations, or one eight-day continuous violation. Further, we hold respondent’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently allowed. This case is remanded to the [181]*181Court of Appeals for further remand to Superior Court, Duplin County for reinstatement of the trial court’s judgment.

REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice NEWBY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

605 S.E.2d 636, 359 N.C. 180, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 1344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-family-farms-v-north-carolina-department-of-environment-natural-nc-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack