Murphy Ex Rel. State v. Fairmont Creamery Co.

12 N.W.2d 197, 73 N.D. 133, 1944 N.D. LEXIS 46
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided December 10, 1944·No. File No. 6903.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case involves the action of the plaintiff as dairy commissioner in canceling a license to do business issued by him to the defendant company. The defendant appealed to the district court from the order of cancellation; and at the same time commenced an action against plaintiff asking for a writ of mandamus requiring the dairy commissioner to vacate his order of cancellation and to issue a license to do business.

In that case — Fairmont Creamery Co. v. Murphy, ante, 126, 12 NW(2d) 71, decided and filed, we hold the district court was correct *134 in issuing tbe writ demanded. Sucb decision disposes of tbe entire situation involved in tbe case at bar.

Morris, Cb. J., and Burr, Christianson, Burke, and Nuessle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy Ex Rel. State v. Fairmont Creamery Co., 12 N.W.2d 197, 73 N.D. 133, 1944 N.D. LEXIS 46 (N.D. 1944).

12 N.W.2d 197 (Murphy Ex Rel. State v. Fairmont Creamery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fairmont Creamery Co. v. Murphy Ex Rel. State
12 N.W.2d 71 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1943)