Murphy, Brown & Co. v. Staton

Supreme Court of Virginia

Murphy, Brown & Co. v. Staton

3 Va. 239

DecidedFebruary 15, 1813

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. 239 (Murphy, Brown & Co. v. Staton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy, Brown & Co. v. Staton, 3 Va. 239 (Va. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

the president delivered the Court’s opinion, that the judgment was erroneous, 61 in this, that the judge of the Court below refused t© [243]*243give the instruction to the jury, required by the counsel for the plaintiffs, in the bill of exceptions mentioned,” and also erred in the instruction he actually gave.

Judgment reversed ; verdict set aside, and a new trial directed; “ on which trial no such instruction as the latter is to be given to the jury.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

the president delivered the Court’s opinion, that the judgment was erroneous, 61 in this, that the judge of the Court below refused t© [243]*243give the instruction to the jury, required by the counsel for the plaintiffs, in the bill of exceptions mentioned,” and also erred in the instruction he actually gave.

Judgment reversed ; verdict set aside, and a new trial directed; “ on which trial no such instruction as the latter is to be given to the jury.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Va. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-brown-co-v-staton-va-1813.