Murphrey v. Winslow

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Murphrey v. Winslow

327 S.E.2d 878, 313 N.C. 320, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1536

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedApril 2, 1985

DocketNo. 533A84

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 327 S.E.2d 878 (Murphrey v. Winslow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphrey v. Winslow, 327 S.E.2d 878, 313 N.C. 320, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1536 (N.C. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In granting summary judgment for defendants, the trial court dismissed plaintiffs complaint for a declaratory judgment and entered judgment for defendants on their counterclaim. The sole issue before this Court is the correctness of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the judgment on the counterclaim. For the reasons stated by Judge Webb in his dissent, the decision of the Court of Appeals as to this issue is reversed and this case is [321]*321remanded to that court for remand to the District Court of Edgecombe County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Justice VAUGHN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In granting summary judgment for defendants, the trial court dismissed plaintiffs complaint for a declaratory judgment and entered judgment for defendants on their counterclaim. The sole issue before this Court is the correctness of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the judgment on the counterclaim. For the reasons stated by Judge Webb in his dissent, the decision of the Court of Appeals as to this issue is reversed and this case is [321]*321remanded to that court for remand to the District Court of Edgecombe County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Justice VAUGHN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 S.E.2d 878, 313 N.C. 320, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphrey-v-winslow-nc-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack