Murphey v. Maynard

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6873

WILLIAM A. MURPHEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARY MAYNARD, Secy-DPSCS; JOHN ROWLEY, Commissioner of Corrections; KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden, ECI; GREGORY WARD, ARP Coordinator, ECI; STEVEN G. TURNAMIAN, M.D.; DAVID MATHIS, M.D.; LYNN COLE, Reg. Manager-CMS; KEVIN JOHNSON, P.A. - CMS; MELISSA HIPON HEXON, RN; DOCTOR JAHLALI, M.D.; MARYAM MESSAFORASH, P.A.,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

DAVID C. DONAVAN, Dr.; CHARLES MEEHAM, Staff PRISM; STEPHEN MEEHAM, Staff PRISM; PATRICK THOMAS, Staff Att. PRISM,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:08-cv-01711-DKC)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 3, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Murphey, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

William A. Murphey appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion to appoint counsel, denying relief on his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P.

59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Murphey v. Maynard, No. 8:08-cv-01711-

DKC (D. Md. filed Jan. 23, 2009 & entered Jan. 26, 2009;

Mar. 16, 2009; filed Apr. 15, 2009 & entered Apr. 16, 2009). We

deny Murphey’s motion for a transcript at government expense and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED