Murphey v. Electric Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Murphey v. Electric Insurance Co.

514 S.W.3d 59, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 186, 2017 WL 1056203

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 21, 2017·No. No. ED 104720·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael and Deborah Murphey (“Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s order and [60] judgment in favor of Electric Insurance Company (“Respondent”) finding the Homeowners Policy (the “Policy”) issued by Respondent to Appellants did not provide coverage for them claim. Appellants claim the trial court erred in holding there was no coverage under the “collapse” provision of the Policy. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael and Deborah Murphey (“Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s order and [60] judgment in favor of Electric Insurance Company (“Respondent”) finding the Homeowners Policy (the “Policy”) issued by Respondent to Appellants did not provide coverage for them claim. Appellants claim the trial court erred in holding there was no coverage under the “collapse” provision of the Policy. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Murphey v. Electric Insurance Co., 514 S.W.3d 59, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 186, 2017 WL 1056203 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

514 S.W.3d 59 (Murphey v. Electric Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.