Murphey v. Electric Insurance Co.

514 S.W.3d 59, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 186, 2017 WL 1056203
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 21, 2017
DocketNo. ED 104720
StatusPublished

This text of 514 S.W.3d 59 (Murphey v. Electric Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphey v. Electric Insurance Co., 514 S.W.3d 59, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 186, 2017 WL 1056203 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael and Deborah Murphey (“Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s order and [60]*60judgment in favor of Electric Insurance Company (“Respondent”) finding the Homeowners Policy (the “Policy”) issued by Respondent to Appellants did not provide coverage for them claim. Appellants claim the trial court erred in holding there was no coverage under the “collapse” provision of the Policy. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
514 S.W.3d 59, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 186, 2017 WL 1056203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphey-v-electric-insurance-co-moctapp-2017.