Murph v. State
370 So. 2d 68, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14503
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 25, 1979
DocketNo. 78-678
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 370 So. 2d 68 (Murph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murph v. State, 370 So. 2d 68, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14503 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction, but we remand the case so that the trial court may set aside the orders assessing costs against appellant. Since the court had adjudged appellant to be insolvent, it was not authorized to assess costs against him. § 939.15, Fla.Stat. (1977); Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nicolodi v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.
370 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
370 So. 2d 68, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murph-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.