Muro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

245 So. 3d 1010
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 6, 2018
DocketNo. 3D17–1765
StatusPublished

This text of 245 So. 3d 1010 (Muro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 245 So. 3d 1010 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hall v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 118 So.3d 847, 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (concluding: "In short, this is an Orange County case which belongs in Orange County") (citing Della-Donna v. Gore Newspaper Co., 390 So.2d 87, 87-88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (concluding: " 'In sum, this is a Broward County case, which belongs *1011in Broward County") (additional citations omitted) ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Della-Donna v. Gore Newspaper Co.
390 So. 2d 87 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Hall v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
118 So. 3d 847 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 So. 3d 1010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muro-v-rj-reynolds-tobacco-co-fladistctapp-2018.