Murnick v. City of Asbury Park
471 A.2d 1203, 193 N.J. Super. 1, 1983 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1055
Opinion
The judgment appealed from is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Andrew’s reported opinion, 5 N.J.Tax 406 (1983).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murnick v. City of Asbury Park, 471 A.2d 1203, 193 N.J. Super. 1, 1983 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1055 (N.J. Ct. App. 1983).
471 A.2d 1203 (Murnick v. City of Asbury Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brae Assoc. v. Park Ridge Borough
21 N.J. Tax 88 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2003)
MSGW Real Estate Fund, LLC v. Mountain Lakes Borough
18 N.J. Tax 95 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1999)
Bridgeland Warehouse v. Garfield City
14 N.J. Tax 189 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
United Jersey Bank v. Director, Div. of Taxation
12 N.J. Tax 516 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1992)
Clearview Gardens Associates v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp.
482 A.2d 523 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
In Re Presentment of Bergen Cty. Grand Jury
471 A.2d 1203 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)