Murnan v. Town of Tonawanda

34 A.D.3d 1296, 824 N.Y.S.2d 551
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 17, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 34 A.D.3d 1296 (Murnan v. Town of Tonawanda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murnan v. Town of Tonawanda, 34 A.D.3d 1296, 824 N.Y.S.2d 551 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered September 6, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied that part of the cross motion of defendant Kathleen S. Konitsch, as administrator of the estate of Helen L. Peters, deceased, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against her on the ground that decedent was not negligent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging that plaintiff Beverly Murnan was injured after tripping and falling on a crack in a sidewalk that was used as part of the driveway of Helen L. Peters (decedent). Supreme Court properly denied that part of the cross motion of Kathleen S. Konitsch (defendant), the administrator of decedent’s estate, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against her on the ground that decedent was not negligent. In support of that part of her cross motion, defendant failed to meet her [1297]*1297burden of establishing that decedent, the abutting landowner, “did nothing to either create the [allegedly] defective condition or cause the condition through the special use of [that part of the public sidewalk] as a driveway” (Adorno v Carty, 23 AD3d 590, 591 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Katz v City of New York, 18 AD3d 818, 819 [2005]; cf. Torres v City of New York, 32 AD 3d 347). Present—Hurlbutt, A.P.J., Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

CAPRETTO, SUSAN v. CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Capretto v. City of Buffalo
124 A.D.3d 1304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
ZARNOCH, JERAD M. v. WILLIAMS, JEFFREY J.
83 A.D.3d 1373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A.D.3d 1296, 824 N.Y.S.2d 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murnan-v-town-of-tonawanda-nyappdiv-2006.