Murnahan v. State

172 So. 3d 549, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12035, 2015 WL 4768810
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 14, 2015
DocketNo. 5D15-1670
StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 3d 549 (Murnahan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murnahan v. State, 172 So. 3d 549, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12035, 2015 WL 4768810 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This court issued a Spencer1 show-cause order directing appellant, Chester R. Mur-nahan, to demonstrate why he should not be barred from filing further pro se challenges to his convictions and sentences in Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit Court Case Number 1999-CF-10926-B-0. Murnahan failed to file a response. As such, we conclude that, since Murnahan is abusing the judicial process, he must be barred from filing any further pro se pleadings.

Accordingly, Murnahan is prohibited from filing with this court any further pro se pleadings concerning Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit Court, case number 1999-CF-10926-B-0. The Clerk of this court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings from Murnahan concerning this case. Any additional pleadings or motions related to this case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk unless they are filed by a member in good standing with The Florida Bar. See Johnson v. State, 652 So.2d 980, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2014); Simpkins v. State, 909 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Rehearing will not be entertained.

Future pro se filings PROHIBITED.

LAWSON, C.J., PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isley v. State
652 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Johnson v. State
652 So. 2d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Simpkins v. State
909 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 So. 3d 549, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12035, 2015 WL 4768810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murnahan-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.