Murmann v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

234 A.D. 860
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murmann v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 A.D. 446

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The question to be certified is: Was the defendant, under the law and practice of this State, entitled to have the Special Term grant its motion to strike out interest on the verdict? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murmann v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 234 A.D. 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

234 A.D. 860 (Murmann v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.