Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 496
United States Customs Court·Decided May 8, 1967·No. No. 60732; protests 179713-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 10 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1547 (a), Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476), and the items marked with the letter "B” at 20 percent under the provision in said paragraph of the tariff act as “Works of art * * * statuary, sculptures, or copies, replicas, or reproductions thereof, valued at not less than $2,50.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 496 (cusc 1967).

38 Cust. Ct. 496 (Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.