Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States

38 Cust. Ct. 496
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 8, 1967
DocketNo. 60732; protests 179713-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 496 (Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States, 38 Cust. Ct. 496 (cusc 1967).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” were held dutiable at 10 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1547 (a), Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476), and the items marked with the letter "B” at 20 percent under the provision in said paragraph of the tariff act as “Works of art * * * statuary, sculptures, or copies, replicas, or reproductions thereof, valued at not less than $2,50.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Cust. Ct. 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murmac-importing-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1967.