Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 414, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 887
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 4, 1954
DocketNo. 58488; protests 181854-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Cust. Ct. 414 (Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 414, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 887 (cusc 1954).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Cust. Ct. 414, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murmac-importing-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1954.