Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 414, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 887

United States Customs Court·Decided November 4, 1954·No. No. 58488; protests 181854-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1547 (a); and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52476).

Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 414, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 887 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

33 Cust. Ct. 414 (Murmac Importing Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.