Murinko v. Strange

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided November 15, 2019·No. 2:19-cv-00943·Unknown

Opinion

The Honorable MARSHA J. PECHMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

SHAWN MURINKO, and DISABILITY NO. 19-cv-00943-MJP RIGHTS WASHINGTON, a nonprofit membership organization for the federally ADAPTED MODEL mandated Protection and Advocacy STIPULATED PROTECTIVE Systems, ORDER Plaintiffs, v. CHERYL STRANGE, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, and SUSAN BIRCH, in her official capacity as Director of the Washington State Health Care Authority, Defendants 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with LCR 26(c). It does not confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential information under seal. 2. “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIAL “Confidential” material shall include the following documents and tangible things produced or otherwise exchanged: A.) Social security numbers (5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)); LCR 5.2a(3)). B.) Personal information in files maintained for clients of public institutions or welfare recipients (42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(8); Wash. Rev. Code 42.56.230(1); Wash. Rev. Code 74.04.060); C.) Health care information (Wash. Rev. Code 70.02.010 (16)); D.) Recordsrelating to mental illness and treatment (Wash. Rev. Code 71.05.390; Wash. Rev. Code 71.34.340); E.) Credit card numbers, debit card numbers, electronic check numbers, card expiration date, bank, or other financial account numbers. LCR 5.2(a)(4). F.) Personal information about agency employees, appointees, or elected officials that would violate the right to privacy (Wash. Rev. Code 42.56.230(3)); See e.g. Brown v. Seattle Public Schools, 71 Wash. App. 613 (1993). G.) Documents containing information regarding the identity of persons making reports regarding vulnerable adults, and all files, reports, records, communications, and working papers used or developed in the investigation or provision of protective services is subject to protection under state law (Wash. Rev. Code 74.34.095). H.) Other material protected by federal or state statute or regulation or court rule. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material. However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in the public domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise. 4. ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 4.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Confidential material must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement. 4.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any confidential material only to: (a) the receiving party’s counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including in house counsel) of the receiving party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, unless the parties agree that a particular document or material produced is for Attorney’s Eyes Only and is so designated; (c) experts and consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (d) the court, court personnel, and court reporters and their staff; (e) copy or imaging services retained by counsel to assist in the duplication of confidential material, provided that counsel for the party retaining the copy or imaging service instructs the service not to disclose any confidential material to third parties and to immediately return all originals and copies of any confidential material; (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the designating party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal confidential material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this agreement; (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 4.3 Filing Confidential Material. Before filing confidential material or discussing or referencing such material in court filings, the filing party shall confer with the designating party to determine whether the designating party will remove the confidential designation, whether the document can be redacted, or whether a motion to seal or stipulation and proposed order is warranted. Local Civil Rule 5(g) sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this agreement must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The designating party must designate for protection only those materials, documents, items, oral or written communications that qualify. Prior to filing designated material with the court, the parties must confer to limit designations to only those parts of materials, documents, items, oral or written communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this agreement. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designa

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murinko v. Strange, (W.D. Wash. 2019).

Murinko v. Strange (Murinko v. Strange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Seattle Public Schools
860 P.2d 1059 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1993)