MURINE, SANTINA v. CITY OF UTICA

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

MURINE, SANTINA v. CITY OF UTICA

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 2014

DocketCA 14-00346

StatusPublished

This text of MURINE, SANTINA v. CITY OF UTICA (MURINE, SANTINA v. CITY OF UTICA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MURINE, SANTINA v. CITY OF UTICA, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

855 CA 14-00346 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ.

SANTINA MURINE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

CITY OF UTICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MARK CURLEY, CORPORATION COUNSEL, UTICA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID M. GIGLIO & ASSOCIATES, LLC, UTICA (ALYSSA O’NEIL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Patrick F. MacRae, J.), entered November 19, 2013. The judgment determined, upon a jury verdict, that defendant is 100% liable for plaintiff’s damages.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI