Murillo v. University of San Francisco
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Even if Murillo’s evidence was sufficient to meet his prima facie burden under McDonnell Douglas, the University established that the reasons it denied Murillo’s tenure application — its well-documented concerns over his poor teaching evaluations and its reservations about the weight and quality of his academic work, and the resulting insufficient ratings under the CBA — were legitimate and non-discriminatory.
Nor did Murillo submit evidence establishing a genuine issue of fact as to pretext.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
223 F. App'x 578 (Murillo v. University of San Francisco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.