Murillo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Murillo v. State

311 S.W.3d 907, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 813, 2010 WL 2360611

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 15, 2010

DocketWD 70653

StatusPublished

This text of 311 S.W.3d 907 (Murillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murillo v. State, 311 S.W.3d 907, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 813, 2010 WL 2360611 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

The Circuit Court of Jackson County, the Honorable Peggy Stevens McGraw presiding, denied Appellant Gerald A. Murillo’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Murillo appeals, arguing that the circuit court erred in finding that he had not proved his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We hold that the circuit court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and accordingly we affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

The Circuit Court of Jackson County, the Honorable Peggy Stevens McGraw presiding, denied Appellant Gerald A. Murillo’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Murillo appeals, arguing that the circuit court erred in finding that he had not proved his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We hold that the circuit court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and accordingly we affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

311 S.W.3d 907, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 813, 2010 WL 2360611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murillo-v-state-moctapp-2010.