Murgatroyd v. McLure
17 F. Cas. 1026, 4 Dall. 342
This text of 17 F. Cas. 1026 (Murgatroyd v. McLure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murgatroyd v. McLure, 17 F. Cas. 1026, 4 Dall. 342 (circtdpa 1800).
Opinion
declared, that the whole transaction, between Murgatroyd and Duncanson, was a mere cover, to evade the laws of the United States; that the former was a mere trustee for the latter; and that, having been paid the full price for the ship, he had no property, on which the replevin could be maintained.
The plaintiff suffered a non-suit
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 F. Cas. 1026, 4 Dall. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murgatroyd-v-mclure-circtdpa-1800.