Murffee v. Murffee

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Murffee v. Murffee

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 621

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedSeptember 18, 1773

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 621 (Murffee v. Murffee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murffee v. Murffee, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 621 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1773).

Pincite

Opinion

On Motion of Mr. John Rutledge Solicitor for the Complainants and by Consent of Mr. Hugh Rutledge Solicitor for the Defendant; It is Ordered that a Commission for Examination of Witnesses in this Cause to be produced on Behalf of the Complainants and that it be directed to Arthur Hart and Moses Pearson Esquires as Commissioners for the Complainants and Claudius Pegues and Alexander MacKintosh on Behalf of the Defendants.

Wm Burrows Mg. in Can.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion of Mr. John Rutledge Solicitor for the Complainants and by Consent of Mr. Hugh Rutledge Solicitor for the Defendant; It is Ordered that a Commission for Examination of Witnesses in this Cause to be produced on Behalf of the Complainants and that it be directed to Arthur Hart and Moses Pearson Esquires as Commissioners for the Complainants and Claudius Pegues and Alexander MacKintosh on Behalf of the Defendants.

Wm Burrows Mg. in Can.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murffee-v-murffee-ctchansc-1773.