Mure v. Mure

92 A.D.3d 653, 937 N.Y.2d 870
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2012·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

“ ‘An appellant who perfects an appeal by using the appendix method must file an appendix that contains all the relevant portions of the record in order to enable the court to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal’ ” (Gandolfi v Gandolfi, 66 AD3d 834, 835 [2009], quoting NYCTL 1998-1 Trust v Shahipour, 29 AD3d 965 [2006]; see Patel v Patel, 270 AD2d 241 [2000]). “The appendix shall contain those portions of the record necessary to permit the court to fully consider the issues which will be raised by the appellant and the respondent” (22 NYCRR 670.10-b [c] [1]; see CPLR 5528 [a] [5]). Here, critical exhibits are missing from the plaintiff’s appendix. “These omissions inhibit the court’s ability to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal” (Matter of Embro v Smith, 59 AD3d 542 [2009] [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]; see Gaffney v Gaffney, 29 AD3d 857 [2006]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Embro v Smith, 59 AD3d at 542). Rivera, J.E, Roman, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mure v. Mure, 92 A.D.3d 653, 937 N.Y.2d 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

92 A.D.3d 653 (Mure v. Mure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kumar v. Chander
2017 NY Slip Op 2633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corp.
2017 NY Slip Op 503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Zutrau v. ICE Systems, Inc.
128 A.D.3d 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
WILSON, J. RICHARD v. WILSON, REBECCA PERKINS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Wilson v. Wilson
128 A.D.3d 1326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Deshuk-Flores v. Flores
116 A.D.3d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Reale v. Reale
104 A.D.3d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Grossman v. Composto-Longhi
96 A.D.3d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)