Mure v. Mure
This text of 92 A.D.3d 653 (Mure v. Mure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“ ‘An appellant who perfects an appeal by using the appendix method must file an appendix that contains all the relevant portions of the record in order to enable the court to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal’ ” (Gandolfi v Gandolfi, 66 AD3d 834, 835 [2009], quoting NYCTL 1998-1 Trust v Shahipour, 29 AD3d 965 [2006]; see Patel v Patel, 270 AD2d 241 [2000]). “The appendix shall contain those portions of the record necessary to permit the court to fully consider the issues which will be raised by the appellant and the respondent” (22 NYCRR 670.10-b [c] [1]; see CPLR 5528 [a] [5]). Here, critical exhibits are missing from the plaintiff’s appendix. “These omissions inhibit the court’s ability to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal” (Matter of Embro v Smith, 59 AD3d 542 [2009] [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]; see Gaffney v Gaffney, 29 AD3d 857 [2006]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Embro v Smith, 59 AD3d at 542). Rivera, J.E, Roman, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A.D.3d 653, 937 N.Y.2d 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mure-v-mure-nyappdiv-2012.