Murdock v. Territory of Arizona
123 P. 315, 14 Ariz. 5, 1912 Ariz. LEXIS 85
Opinion
The appellant has filed no abstract of the record, brief, or assignment of errors in this cause, and has not called our attention to any specific action of the trial court prejudicial to the rights of the defendant. Nevertheless we have carefully examined the record, as we deem it our duty to do in criminal cases, and we find no reversible error appearing therein.
Therefore the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murdock v. Territory of Arizona, 123 P. 315, 14 Ariz. 5, 1912 Ariz. LEXIS 85 (Ark. 1912).
123 P. 315 (Murdock v. Territory of Arizona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Orange County Social Services Agency v. Herbert B.
40 Cal. App. 4th 825 (California Court of Appeal, 1995)
Martinez v. State
176 P. 582 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1918)