Murdock v. Holland's Heirs

3 Blackf. 114, 1832 Ind. LEXIS 36
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 28, 1832·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ERROR to the Franklin Circuit Court.

Suit in chancery against an administrator to account, &c. The accounts of the defendant were referred to a master, and the defendant was to give the complainant notice of the time of appearing before the master. No step was taken by the defendant during the next vacation. The Court at a subsequent term, no good reason being given for the defendant’s default, rendered a final decree, on bill, answer, and proofs, against the defendant. Held, that there was no error in the [115] proceeding. Held, also, that mistakes, &c. in the settlement of administrators’ accounts in the Probate Court, may be cor-reeled by a Court of chancery (1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murdock v. Holland's Heirs, 3 Blackf. 114, 1832 Ind. LEXIS 36 (Ind. 1832).

3 Blackf. 114 (Murdock v. Holland's Heirs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parsons v. Milford
67 Ind. 489 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)
Goodwin v. Goodwin
48 Ind. 584 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)