Murdock v. Holland's Heirs

3 Blackf. 114, 1832 Ind. LEXIS 36
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 28, 1832
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Blackf. 114 (Murdock v. Holland's Heirs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murdock v. Holland's Heirs, 3 Blackf. 114, 1832 Ind. LEXIS 36 (Ind. 1832).

Opinion

ERROR to the Franklin Circuit Court.

Suit in chancery against an administrator to account, &c. The accounts of the defendant were referred to a master, and the defendant was to give the complainant notice of the time of appearing before the master. No step was taken by the defendant during the next vacation. The Court at a subsequent term, no good reason being given for the defendant’s default, rendered a final decree, on bill, answer, and proofs, against the defendant. Held, that there was no error in the [115]*115proceeding. Held, also, that mistakes, &c. in the settlement of administrators’ accounts in the Probate Court, may be cor-reeled by a Court of chancery (1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parsons v. Milford
67 Ind. 489 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)
Goodwin v. Goodwin
48 Ind. 584 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Blackf. 114, 1832 Ind. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murdock-v-hollands-heirs-ind-1832.