Murdock Ready Mixed Concrete Company v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina·Decided April 7, 2025·No. 5:24-cv-00278·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. 5:24-cv-00278-M-BM MURDOCK READY MIXED CONCRETE COMPANY, Plaintiff, ORDER V. RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS (AMERICA) INC., et al., Defendants.

This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff's pro se Motion to Submit B12 Compliance Email. [DE 39]. As described in the court’s April 2, 2025, order, Plaintiff, a corporate entity, may appear in federal court “only through licensed counsel.” Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory Counsil, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993). Because Plaintiff has not yet retained counsel, as ordered, the motion is improperly before the court and is thus DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

_ otk SO ORDERED this] day of April, 2025.

aan a 2: (Vyeurs = CHARD E. MYERS II CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murdock Ready Mixed Concrete Company v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc., (E.D.N.C. 2025).

Murdock Ready Mixed Concrete Company v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. (Murdock Ready Mixed Concrete Company v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related