Murdock, Kerr & Co. v. Walker

25 A. 492, 152 Pa. 595, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1023
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 44·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the decree of the court of common pleas No. 3, of Allegheny county, restraining the defendants from gathering about plaintiffs’ place of business, and from following the workmen employed bjr plaintiffs, or who may hereafter be so employed, to and from their work, and gathering about the boarding houses of said workmen; and from any and all manner of threats, menaces, intimidation, opprobrious epithets, ridicule and annoyance to and against said workmen or any of them, for or on account of their working for the plaintiffs.

The decree is affirmed, for the reasons given by the learned judge of the court below in his opinion, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murdock, Kerr & Co. v. Walker, 25 A. 492, 152 Pa. 595, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1023 (Pa. 1893).

25 A. 492 (Murdock, Kerr & Co. v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SKF Industries, Inc. v. Local No. 2898 United Steelworkers of America
56 Pa. D. & C. 149 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1945)
Mitchell v. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co.
214 F. 685 (Fourth Circuit, 1914)
Everett Waddey Co. v. Richmond Typographical Union No. 90
53 S.E. 273 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1906)
Union Pac. R. Co. v. Ruef
120 F. 102 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska, 1902)
American Steel & Wire Co. v. Wire Drawers' & Die Makers' Unions Nos. 1 & 3
90 F. 608 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1898)
Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. McConnell
82 F. 65 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee, 1897)
Consolidated Steel & Wire Co. v. Murray
80 F. 811 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio, 1897)
Davis v. Zimmerman
36 N.Y.S. 303 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)