Murdoch v. Pittsburg

72 A. 701, 223 Pa. 283, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 523
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 4, 1909
DocketNo. 2; Appeals, Nos. 169, 170 and 172
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 72 A. 701 (Murdoch v. Pittsburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murdoch v. Pittsburg, 72 A. 701, 223 Pa. 283, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 523 (Pa. 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

These appeals are from orders dismissing exceptions to the report of viewers assessing benefits to pay for the costs and expenses of grading, paving and curbing a city street. The exceptions did not question the liability to assessment nor the regularity of the proceedings, nor the action of the viewers in any way except that they erred in judgment in determining the amount of benefits.

The appeals are dismissed and the orders are affirmed on the opinion of Judge Evans.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Altman v. City of Philadelphia
12 Pa. D. & C.2d 621 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1956)
West Market Street Paving
135 A. 633 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 A. 701, 223 Pa. 283, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murdoch-v-pittsburg-pa-1909.