Murdoch v. Jackson

234 A.D.2d 6, 650 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12256
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 3, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 234 A.D.2d 6 (Murdoch v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murdoch v. Jackson, 234 A.D.2d 6, 650 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered September 26,1995, which granted defendants’ motion for an extension of time to serve a demand for a change of venue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The extension was a proper exercise of discretion, where the complaint misstated that plaintiffs were New York City residents, the motion was made within seven weeks after the defendants served their answer, and plaintiffs remain free, if so advised, to oppose a change of venue as an inconvenience (CPLR 510 [3]). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burr v. Crary
2024 NY Slip Op 01503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D.2d 6, 650 N.Y.S.2d 154, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murdoch-v-jackson-nyappdiv-1996.