Murdaugh v. Queens-Nassau Transit Lines, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murdaugh v. Queens-Nassau Transit Lines, Inc.

280 A.D. 826, 113 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3827

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 280 A.D. 826 (Murdaugh v. Queens-Nassau Transit Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murdaugh v. Queens-Nassau Transit Lines, Inc., 280 A.D. 826, 113 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order, made on reargument, granting a motion under section 306 of the Civil Practice Act for a physical examination of appellant and the taking of X rays, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. The granting of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Braun v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 248 App. Div. 586.) There is no change in the situation here that would warrant a second examination. Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel and MaeCrate,- JJ., concur; Adel and Schmidt, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm. [See post, p. 933.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order, made on reargument, granting a motion under section 306 of the Civil Practice Act for a physical examination of appellant and the taking of X rays, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. The granting of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Braun v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 248 App. Div. 586.) There is no change in the situation here that would warrant a second examination. Carswell, Acting P. J., Wenzel and MaeCrate,- JJ., concur; Adel and Schmidt, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm. [See post, p. 933.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D. 826, 113 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murdaugh-v-queens-nassau-transit-lines-inc-nyappdiv-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack