Murciano v. Jayan Corp.

599 So. 2d 284, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6231, 1992 WL 123431
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 1992·No. No. 92-73·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs in a quiet title action from an adverse final summary judgment. It appears that the plaintiffs’ condominium was sold to the defendant herein for nonpayment of real property taxes. Based on the circumstances of this case, we are unpersuaded that the admitted statutory compliance of notice to the plaintiffs of the tax deed sale herein violated the due process requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. §§ 197.502(4)(a), 197.-522(l)(a); Williams v. Jones, 326 So.2d 425 (Fla.1975), appeal dismissed, 429 U.S. 803, 97 S.Ct. 34, 50 L.Ed.2d 63 (1976); D.R.L., Inc. v. Murphy, 508 So.2d 413 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 518 So.2d 1277 (Fla.1987); Weiss v. Prudential Enters., Inc., 387 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Stubbs v. Cummings, 336 So.2d 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); cf. Mennonite Bd. of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791, 103 S.Ct. 2706, 77 L.Ed.2d 180 (1983).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murciano v. Jayan Corp., 599 So. 2d 284, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6231, 1992 WL 123431 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

599 So. 2d 284 (Murciano v. Jayan Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saggese v. Dept. of Revenue
770 So. 2d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)