Murchison v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Murchison v. State

492 S.W.3d 223, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 642, 2016 WL 3661832

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 28, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103007

StatusPublished

This text of 492 S.W.3d 223 (Murchison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murchison v. State, 492 S.W.3d 223, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 642, 2016 WL 3661832 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Murchison appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction'relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. ■

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorán-dum setting forth the reasons for our deci- . sion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84;16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Murchison appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction'relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. ■

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorán-dum setting forth the reasons for our deci- . sion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84;16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 S.W.3d 223, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 642, 2016 WL 3661832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murchison-v-state-moctapp-2016.