Murchison v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Murchison v. State

492 S.W.3d 223, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 642, 2016 WL 3661832

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2016·No. No. ED 103007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Murchison appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction'relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. ■

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorán-dum setting forth the reasons for our deci- . sion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84;16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Murchison appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction'relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. ■

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorán-dum setting forth the reasons for our deci- . sion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84;16(b).

Murchison v. State, 492 S.W.3d 223, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 642, 2016 WL 3661832 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

492 S.W.3d 223 (Murchison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.