Murchison v. State

256 S.W.3d 616, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 869, 2008 WL 2586448
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2008·No. ED 90213·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Murchison appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murchison v. State, 256 S.W.3d 616, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 869, 2008 WL 2586448 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

256 S.W.3d 616 (Murchison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanders v. STIVERS TEMPORARY PERSONNEL, INC.
256 S.W.3d 616 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)