Murbas Trading Co. v. States

U.S. Customs Court

Murbas Trading Co. v. States

43 Cust. Ct. 449

United States Customs Court·Decided December 23, 1959·No. No. 63637; protests 280471-K and 281920-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects to that involved in Dalton Cooper, Inc., et al. v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 2051), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Donlon, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in C.D. 2051, supra.

[451]*451DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES CUSTOMS COURT Valuation Decisions on Remand from Protest Proceedings

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects to that involved in Dalton Cooper, Inc., et al. v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 2051), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Donlon, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in C.D. 2051, supra.

[451]*451DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES CUSTOMS COURT Valuation Decisions on Remand from Protest Proceedings

Murbas Trading Co. v. States, 43 Cust. Ct. 449 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

43 Cust. Ct. 449 (Murbas Trading Co. v. States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related