Murbas Trading Co. v. States

43 Cust. Ct. 449
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 23, 1959
DocketNo. 63637; protests 280471-K and 281920-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 43 Cust. Ct. 449 (Murbas Trading Co. v. States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murbas Trading Co. v. States, 43 Cust. Ct. 449 (cusc 1959).

Opinion

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects to that involved in Dalton Cooper, Inc., et al. v. United States (41 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 2051), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Donlon, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in C.D. 2051, supra.

[451]*451DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES CUSTOMS COURT Valuation Decisions on Remand from Protest Proceedings

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dalton Cooper, Inc. v. United States
41 Cust. Ct. 271 (U.S. Customs Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Cust. Ct. 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murbas-trading-co-v-states-cusc-1959.