Murayama v. Kalani Construction Incorporated
This text of Murayama v. Kalani Construction Incorporated (Murayama v. Kalani Construction Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 01-NOV-2024 08:06 AM Dkt. 65 SO
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
JARED K. MURAYAMA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KALANI CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED, a Hawaii corporation; RANDAL K. MIYASHIRO, SR.; HILDEGARDE MIYASHIRO; JOHN MUNDON; KIP FURUGEN; EARTHWORKS PACIFIC, INC., a Hawaii corporation; SAMUEL K. THRONAS CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Hawaii corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; and DOE ASSOCIATIONS, CORPORATIONS OR OTHER ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants
KALANI CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED, a Hawaii corporation and RANDAL K. MIYASHIRO, SR., Counterclaimants-Appellees, v. JARED KAWAOKA MURAYAMA and DONNA MOI LINN MURAYAMA, individually and as Co-Trustees of the JARED AND DONNA MURAYAMA 1997 TRUST dated January 8, 1997, Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees
KALANI CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATED, a Hawaii corporation and RANDAL K. MIYASHIRO, SR., Third-party Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JARED KAWAOKA MURAYAMA, as Co-Trustee of the JARED AND DONNA MURAYAMA 1997 TRUST dated January 8, 1997; DONNA MOI LINN MURAYAMA, individually and as Co-Trustee of the JARED AND DONNA MURAYAMA 1997 TRUST dated January 8, 1997, Third-party Defendants-Appellees
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 5CC191000062) NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.)
Jared K. Murayama appeals from the June 4, 2021 "Order Denying [Murayama]'s Second Motion for Reconsideration of Denial of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative to Preclude Counterclaim Plaintiffs from Seeking or Obtaining Any Interest in the Puhi Lot" entered by the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit.1 We have jurisdiction only to review paragraph nos. 2 and 3 of the Order, which ordered Murayama to pay $6,887.43 in attorneys fees and costs to Kalani Construction Incorporated and Randal K. Miyashiro, Sr. within 30 days. See Harada v. Ellis, 60 Haw. 467, 480, 591 P.2d 1060, 1070 (1979) (noting order for payment of discovery sanction enforceable through contempt proceedings was immediately appealable under collateral order doctrine). We review for abuse of discretion. Kaina v. Gellman, 119 Hawai#i 324, 329, 197 P.3d 776, 781 (App. 2008). The Order did not state the authority for the circuit court's award of fees and costs, as required by Kaina, 119 Hawai#i at 331, 197 P.3d at 783. If the circuit court relied on Hawai#i Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rule 11, it did not follow the procedure prescribed by HRCP Rule 11(c)(1)(B). If the circuit court relied on its inherent power, it didn't make "a specific finding of bad faith." Kaina, 119 Hawai#i at 331, 197 P.3d at 783. The record does not show "clear evidence that the challenged actions [were] entirely without color, and [were] taken for reasons of harassment or delay or for other improper purposes[.]" Enos v. Pac. Transfer & Warehouse, Inc., 79 Hawai#i 452, 458, 903 P.2d 1273, 1279 (1995). The transcript of the May 12, 2021 hearing on Murayama's motion for reconsideration does not show "a high degree of specificity in the factual findings of the" circuit court. Id.
1 The Honorable Kathleen N.A. Watanabe presided.
2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
The circuit court acted outside of its discretion by assessing Kalani's and Miyashiro's attorneys fees and costs against Murayama without stating the authority for the award and either following the procedure under HRCP Rule 11(c)(1)(B) or making a specific finding of bad faith. Paragraph nos. 2 and 3 of the circuit court's June 4, 2021 Order are reversed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 1, 2024.
On the briefs: /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Daniel Hempey, Acting Chief Judge Keith Matsuoka, Michelle Premeaux, /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka for Plaintiff/ Associate Judge Counterclaim Defendant- Appellant Jared K. Murayama. /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge Margery S. Bronster, Sunny S. Lee, Lanson K. Kupau, Kelly A. Higa Brown, for Defendants/Counter- claimants-Appellees Kalani Construction, Inc. and Randal K. Miyashiro and Defendants-Appellees Hildegarde Miyashiro and Earthworks Pacific, Inc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Murayama v. Kalani Construction Incorporated, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murayama-v-kalani-construction-incorporated-hawapp-2024.