Murauskas v. Department of Public Safety, State of Hawai‘i

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 21, 2012
DocketSCWC-11-0000496
StatusPublished

This text of Murauskas v. Department of Public Safety, State of Hawai‘i (Murauskas v. Department of Public Safety, State of Hawai‘i) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murauskas v. Department of Public Safety, State of Hawai‘i, (haw 2012).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000496 21-FEB-2012 09:28 AM

NO. SCWC-11-0000496

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

KEITH MURAUSKAS, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. CAAP-11-0000496; CIV. NO. 09-1-1272-06)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and Circuit Judge Border, in place of McKenna, J., recused)

Petitioner/plaintiff-appellant Keith Murauskas filed an

application for a writ of certiorari to review of the

Intermediate Court of Appeals' (ICA) dismissal of petitioner's

appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The time for filing

an application for a writ of certiorari commenced upon the filing

of the ICA's September 15, 2011 order of dismissal, not the ICA's

October 6, 2011 order denying reconsideration of the dismissal.

See HRS § 602-59(c) (Supp. 2010) ("An application for a writ of

certiorari may be filed in the supreme court no later than ninety

days after the filing of the judgment or dismissal order of the

intermediate appellate court.") (underscoring added). Petitioner's application for a writ of certiorari -- deemed filed

on January 2, 2012 when it was delivered to prison officials for

mailing -- was filed more than ninety days after the filing of

the September 15, 2011 order of dismissal. The application is

untimely. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for a writ of

certiorari is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 21, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.

/s/ Patrick W. Border

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 602-59
Hawaii § 602-59(c)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Murauskas v. Department of Public Safety, State of Hawai‘i, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murauskas-v-department-of-public-safety-state-of-h-haw-2012.