Muratovic v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Muratovic v. State

429 S.W.3d 485, 2014 WL 1705344, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 466

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 29, 2014·No. No. ED 99476·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samer Muratovic (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant contends that his attorney was ineffective for failing to adequately inform Movant of the deportation consequences of his guilty plea. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samer Muratovic (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant contends that his attorney was ineffective for failing to adequately inform Movant of the deportation consequences of his guilty plea. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Muratovic v. State, 429 S.W.3d 485, 2014 WL 1705344, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 466 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

429 S.W.3d 485 (Muratovic v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.