MURASKO v. Loo
258 P.3d 946
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in MURASKO v. Loo. Read the opinion of the Court — 125 Haw. 39 →
Opinion
MATTHEW MURASKO, ALANE PODOLL and KYLE PODOLL, Petitioners,
v.
THE HONORABLE RHONDA I.L. LOO, JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI`I; PAT CURELL and ROSINELI CURELL, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Hawaii.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
RECKTENWALD, C.J., NAKAYAMA, ACOBA, and DUFFY, JJ. and Circuit Judge NACINO, assigned by reason of vacancy.
Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration, filed on March 17, 2011 by respondents Pat Curell and Rosineli Curell, and the record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MURASKO v. Loo, 258 P.3d 946 (haw 2011).
258 P.3d 946 (MURASKO v. Loo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.