Murad v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murad v. State

691 So. 2d 1205, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4146, 1997 WL 194762

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 23, 1997

DocketNo. 96-3209

StatusPublished

This text of 691 So. 2d 1205 (Murad v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murad v. State, 691 So. 2d 1205, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4146, 1997 WL 194762 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying defendant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion as to ground two of her motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing as the record does not conclusively refute defendant’s allegations as to her attorney’s misad-vice concerning gain-time eligibility. See State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Booth v. State, 687 So.2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). On remand, the court must conduct a hearing “to determine the merits of ... defendant’s claim that [she] relied in good faith upon the erroneous advice of [her] attorney in entering a plea.” Leroux, 689 So.2d at 238.

We affirm the remaining portions of the order.

[1206]*1206Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying defendant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion as to ground two of her motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing as the record does not conclusively refute defendant’s allegations as to her attorney’s misad-vice concerning gain-time eligibility. See State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Booth v. State, 687 So.2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). On remand, the court must conduct a hearing “to determine the merits of ... defendant’s claim that [she] relied in good faith upon the erroneous advice of [her] attorney in entering a plea.” Leroux, 689 So.2d at 238.

We affirm the remaining portions of the order.

[1206]*1206Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

691 So. 2d 1205, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4146, 1997 WL 194762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murad-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack