Munzon v. Victor at Fifth, LLC

2018 NY Slip Op 3851
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 30, 2018
Docket2015-12528
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 3851 (Munzon v. Victor at Fifth, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Munzon v. Victor at Fifth, LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 3851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Munzon v Victor at Fifth, LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 03851)
Munzon v Victor at Fifth, LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 03851
Decided on May 30, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 30, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
SANDRA L. SGROI
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2015-12528
(Index No. 21838/12)

[*1]Juan P. Munzon, respondent,

v

Victor at Fifth, LLC, et al., appellants (and other titles).


Armienti, DeBellis, Guglielmo & Rhoden, LLP (Carol R. Finocchio, New York, NY, of counsel), for appellants.

Jacob Oresky & Associates, PLLC (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York, NY [Brian J. Isaac and Kenneth J. Gorman], of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Timothy J. Dufficy, J.), entered November 30, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action, and denied those branches of the defendants' motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law §§ 240(1) and 241(6) causes of action.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action on August 1, 2016 (see Matter of Aho , 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1]; Munzon v Victor at Fifth, LLC, et al., ____AD3d____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2016-09779; decided herewith]).

AUSTIN, J.P., ROMAN, SGROI and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 3851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munzon-v-victor-at-fifth-llc-nyappdiv-2018.