Munzi v. Kennedy

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Munzi v. Kennedy

538 A.2d 1015, 1988 R.I. LEXIS 39, 1988 WL 23414

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMarch 22, 1988

DocketNo. 87-459-Appeal

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 538 A.2d 1015 (Munzi v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munzi v. Kennedy, 538 A.2d 1015, 1988 R.I. LEXIS 39, 1988 WL 23414 (R.I. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On March 8, 1988 the plaintiff, through her counsel, appeared before this court to [1016]*1016show cause why her appeal from the grant by a Superior Court justice of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment should not be denied. The plaintiff was seeking damages for injuries she received when she fell down a flight of stairs which ran from the first to the second floor in a single-family residence that the defendants had rented to the plaintiffs son. The plaintiff faults the defendants for the absence of a handrail and inadequate lighting.

Recently in Ward v. Watson, 524 A.2d 1108, 1109 (R.I. 1987), we reiterated the “long-settled rule that in Rhode Island a landlord is not liable for injuries sustained by a tenant or guest on the tenant’s premises, unless the injury results from a latent defect known to the landlord but not to the tenant, or from the landlord’s breach of a covenant to repair.” There is no dispute that the landlords never made any agreement relative to repairs, and it is obvious that the lack of a handrail and the alleged lighting conditions were patent, rather than latent, defects.

The plaintiffs’ appeal is denied and dismissed. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On March 8, 1988 the plaintiff, through her counsel, appeared before this court to [1016]*1016show cause why her appeal from the grant by a Superior Court justice of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment should not be denied. The plaintiff was seeking damages for injuries she received when she fell down a flight of stairs which ran from the first to the second floor in a single-family residence that the defendants had rented to the plaintiffs son. The plaintiff faults the defendants for the absence of a handrail and inadequate lighting.

Recently in Ward v. Watson, 524 A.2d 1108, 1109 (R.I. 1987), we reiterated the “long-settled rule that in Rhode Island a landlord is not liable for injuries sustained by a tenant or guest on the tenant’s premises, unless the injury results from a latent defect known to the landlord but not to the tenant, or from the landlord’s breach of a covenant to repair.” There is no dispute that the landlords never made any agreement relative to repairs, and it is obvious that the lack of a handrail and the alleged lighting conditions were patent, rather than latent, defects.

The plaintiffs’ appeal is denied and dismissed. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 A.2d 1015, 1988 R.I. LEXIS 39, 1988 WL 23414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munzi-v-kennedy-ri-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack