Munter Appeal

207 A.2d 233, 417 Pa. 261, 1965 Pa. LEXIS 410
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 25, 1965
DocketAppeals, Nos. 275 and 276
StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.2d 233 (Munter Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Munter Appeal, 207 A.2d 233, 417 Pa. 261, 1965 Pa. LEXIS 410 (Pa. 1965).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Munter, taxpayer and owner of property in the City of Pittsburgh, appeals from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas which sustained the tax assessment of his property. The Board offered in evidence the assessment of Munter’s property with a breakdown of the valuation and assessment into (a) building, and (b) land.

Munter contends that there was a lack of uniformity in the assessment of his property and consequently a denial of his Constitutional rights.

In order to establish lack of uniformity, Munter relies upon the testimony of a real estate expert whose testimony the hearing Judge found was vague and of little or no value. We have examined the record and find no clear abuse of discretion or error of law.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 A.2d 233, 417 Pa. 261, 1965 Pa. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munter-appeal-pa-1965.