Munsterman v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Munsterman v. Crawford

535 So. 2d 743, 1989 La. LEXIS 29, 1989 WL 1828

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 6, 1989

DocketNo. 88-C-2680

StatusPublished

This text of 535 So. 2d 743 (Munsterman v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munsterman v. Crawford, 535 So. 2d 743, 1989 La. LEXIS 29, 1989 WL 1828 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Crawford, Charles L.; Jennings, Louise C.; Ewin, Dabney; Ewin, Gordon; Ewin, James P.; Scott, James; Scott, Leroy H.; Crawford, Walter L. Dr.; Grosz, Es-mond A.; Scott, Charles; DeBlieux, John; —Defendants); applying for writ of certio-rari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA87-676; Parish of Evangeline, 13th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 40400-A.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., assigns additional concurring reasons. DIXON, C.J., would grant the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Crawford, Charles L.; Jennings, Louise C.; Ewin, Dabney; Ewin, Gordon; Ewin, James P.; Scott, James; Scott, Leroy H.; Crawford, Walter L. Dr.; Grosz, Es-mond A.; Scott, Charles; DeBlieux, John; —Defendants); applying for writ of certio-rari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA87-676; Parish of Evangeline, 13th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 40400-A.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., assigns additional concurring reasons. DIXON, C.J., would grant the writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

535 So. 2d 743, 1989 La. LEXIS 29, 1989 WL 1828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munsterman-v-crawford-la-1989.