Munster v. City of Battle Creek
753 N.W.2d 148, 482 Mich. 897
This text of 753 N.W.2d 148 (Munster v. City of Battle Creek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Munster v. City of Battle Creek, 753 N.W.2d 148, 482 Mich. 897 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Ronald MUNSTER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF BATTLE CREEK, Defendant-Appellant, and
Second Injury Fund, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals. The motion to consolidate is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
753 N.W.2d 148, 482 Mich. 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munster-v-city-of-battle-creek-mich-2008.