Munson v. Leaman Transportation Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Munson v. Leaman Transportation Co.

257 A.D. 888, 12 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8292

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 257 A.D. 888 (Munson v. Leaman Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munson v. Leaman Transportation Co., 257 A.D. 888, 12 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Schenectady Special Term of the Supreme Court, denying her motion for an examination before trial of defendant Charles Heebner. The action is brought by plaintiff as administratrix to recover damages for the death of her husband which occurred in the early morning of February 8, 1939, when the car which he was operating on State street in the city of Schenectady collided with a truck owned by the corporate defendant and driven by the codefendant. There were no eye witnesses to the accident. Plaintiff is entitled to examine defendant before trial. Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the authority of Brand v. Butts (242 App. Div. 149); Breault v. Embossing Company, Inc. (253 id. 175). All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Schenectady Special Term of the Supreme Court, denying her motion for an examination before trial of defendant Charles Heebner. The action is brought by plaintiff as administratrix to recover damages for the death of her husband which occurred in the early morning of February 8, 1939, when the car which he was operating on State street in the city of Schenectady collided with a truck owned by the corporate defendant and driven by the codefendant. There were no eye witnesses to the accident. Plaintiff is entitled to examine defendant before trial. Order reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the authority of Brand v. Butts (242 App. Div. 149); Breault v. Embossing Company, Inc. (253 id. 175). All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 888, 12 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munson-v-leaman-transportation-co-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack