Munson S.S. Line v. Elswick Steam Shipping Co.

214 F. 84, 130 C.C.A. 612, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1121
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 7, 1914·No. No. 179·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This decree is affirmed on Judge Veeder’s opinion, with the note that we do not find it necessary to pass upon what the rights of the parties would have been if the charterer had been in a position to load at Buenos, Aires before the expiration of the flat term of six months; nor to inquire which party would benefit most by redelivery of the steamer in the United Kingdom. Doubtless a charter party may be drawn so as to make such redelivery a privilege from the owner to the charterer, -but in this charter such redelivery is a contractual obligation of the charterer to the owner, and as such the owner may waive it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Munson S.S. Line v. Elswick Steam Shipping Co., 214 F. 84, 130 C.C.A. 612, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1121 (2d Cir. 1914).

214 F. 84 (Munson S.S. Line v. Elswick Steam Shipping Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Britain S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. Line
31 F.2d 530 (Second Circuit, 1929)
Britain S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. Line
25 F.2d 868 (S.D. New York, 1928)
Thor v. Tropical Fruit Co.
281 F. 740 (Second Circuit, 1922)
The Themis
244 F. 545 (S.D. New York, 1917)